Comments for Hollywood Everafter

Comment on Cindy Sheehan Endorsed by Penn, Sheen and Barr by Harvey

Harvey — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:49:14 +0000

Penn, Sheen, Barr and Cindy Sheehan! Talk about a convention of idiots! If only Michael Moore and Ralph Nader would show up to make the circus complete!

Comment on Cindy Sheehan Endorsed by Penn, Sheen and Barr by TomSongs

TomSongs — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:14:34 +0000

Windmills aside, Cindy is fighting the good fight!

Hey,Hey, Nancy!

Comment on Cindy Sheehan Endorsed by Penn, Sheen and Barr by jonolan

jonolan — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:54:09 +0000

Only San Francisco could come up with a candidate worse than Pelosi. LOL

Please, please, please, San Francisco, formally secede from America! You left in spirit a long time ago anyway.

Comment on Daytime TV’s Un-Fairness Doctrine by mulloverthis

mulloverthis — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 04:30:59 +0000

Oprah can do what she wants. She always does. And, as for your fairness analyzing and assessment, she has not had any of the politicians running for the President on her comfy couch since any of them announced their candidacy, and still remain of the campaign trail. There is selective analysis on the media analyst’s part in questioning her fairness. Now, she can support NObama if she wants on her website. You have chosen to support the ditzy Governor Palin. Hilary, nor Geraldine Ferraro, two fems with comparable nods BEFORE Palin, haven’t hit her couch during this election season either. So what’s fair is that we be fair in our representations when crying for fairness. Now, Sarah has a gazillion of supporters, but most of them are patently UNINFORMED and gawking over her looks and youthfulness. I’ll be happy to substantiate that statement by statement, the more Palin opens her mouth. Whoopi just doesn’t want a dingbat in office cause she happens to have a hormonal dominance of estrogen. Some of us prefer beauty with a brain. Palin may have one, it is just severely underdeveloped when it comes to politics beyond the endangerment status of bears. http://www.mulloverthis.wordpress.com

Comment on John Edwards’ Hollywood Production by KH

KH — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:43:49 +0000

Your “One key question is: Why would Edwards direct his PAC to pay an arguably inflated price to a relatively inexperienced individual to have her work on such an important project?” is one that should be answered.

It is disturbing when I read “Filmmaker Rielle Hunter”. Her films are so amateurish. If she is a filmmaker, then anyone with a video camera is a filmmaker. Her graphics, editing, choice of scenes all reflect that she is nothing more than a person that just bought a camera at Best Buy. I don’t get why the Associated Press would classify her as a filmmaker. I would not have paid her $100 for one of those webisodes. It does not add up.

Comment on Mars Cancels Mr. T Ad Over Nutty Allegation by Slipstream

Slipstream — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:35:54 +0000

Mr. T is the man and pulling the ad is stupid! I mean what year do we live in, last time I checked it was 2008 for pity sake.
I just downloaded Mr. T’s voice from Navtones.com for my GPS and I love it. But my question is, am I meant to get offended every time I make a wrong turn and he calls me a fool or something? On that note, I also go Kim Cattrall from Navtones, can I claim she is sexually harassing me when she says, “Lets just pull over and get in the backseat, thats bigger enough for us two, or maybe three”?
The Snickers ad is just an ad and with them pulling it, it’s probably getting more attention than it would have if it just came out. (Pun)
“Get Some Nuts.”

Comment on Clint Eastwood Spars with Spike Lee by Chin Drooler

Chin Drooler — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:22:47 +0000

Come on Spike!

You shouldn’t call Clint an angry old man. Us angry old men take that personal.